Journal Articles: OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine whether incorporation of a 2-part artificial intelligence (AI) filter can improve the positive predictive value (PPV) of implantable loop recorder (ILR)–detected atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes. BACKGROUND ILRs can detect AF. Devices transmit data daily. It is critical that the PPV of ILR-detected AF events be high. METHODS In total, 1,500 AF episodes were evaluated from patients with cryptogenic stroke or known AF who underwent ILR implantation (Reveal LINQ, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota). Each episode was annotated as either a true or false AF episode to determine the PPV. A 2-part AI-based filter (Cardiologs, Paris, France) was then employed using a deep neural network (DNN) for AF detection. The impact of this DNN filter on the PPV was then assessed. RESULTS The cohort included 425 patients (mean age 69 10 years; 62% men) with an ILR. After excluding 17 (1.1%) uninterpretable electrocardiograms, 800 (53.9%) of the remaining 1,483 episodes were manually adjudicated to represent an actual atrial arrhythmia. The PPV of ILR-detected AF episodes was 53.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 51.4% to 56.5%), which increased to 74.5% (95% CI: 71.8% to 77.0%; p < 0.001) following use of the DNN filter. The increase was greatest for AF episodes #30 min. The most common reason for a false-positive AF event was premature atrial contractions. There was a negligible failure to identify true AF episodes. CONCLUSIONS Despite currently available ILR programming options, designed to maximize PPV in a given population, false-positive AF episodes remain common. An AI-based solution may significantly reduce the time and effort needed to adjudicate these false-positive events.
- Journal Articles
Related Resources
European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/ Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is an important treatment option for maintaining a normal heart rhythm and reducing arrhythmia-related symptoms. This consensus statement provides healthcare providers with clinical practice standards and advice on which patients should receive ablation, how to perform the procedure, and how to manage patients before, during, and afterwards.
2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards Update: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force
Journal Articles: The last expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards was published in 2001 (1). Since then, many changes have occurred as the setting has evolved from being primarily diagnostic based into a therapeutic environment. Technology has changed both the imaging and reporting systems. The lower risk of invasive procedures has seen the expansion of cardiac catheterization laboratories to sites without onsite cardiovascular surgery backup and even to community hospitals where primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is now being performed. This has increased the importance of quality assurance (QA) and quality improvement (QI) initiatives. At the same time, the laboratory has become a multipurpose suite with both diagnostic procedures to investigate pulmonary hypertension and coronary flow and with therapeutic procedures that now include intervention into the cerebral and peripheral vascular systems as well as in structural heart disease. These new procedures have impacted both the adult and pediatric catheterization laboratories. The approaches now available allow for the treatment of even very complex heart disease and have led to the development of hybrid cardiac catheterization laboratories where a team of physicians (including invasive cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, noninvasive cardiologists, and anesthesiologists) is required.