Journal Articles: Background—The second-generation cryoballoon delivers effective pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) associated with superior 1-year clinical outcome. However, data on reconduction of previously isolated PV are sparse. Methods and Results—A total of 421 patients underwent second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon-based PVI in 2 centers (St. George’s hospital and Harburg hospital, Hamburg, Germany) between June 2012 and May 2015. Sixty-six of 421 (16%) patients (39/66, 59% women; mean age, 63±10 years, mean left atrium diameter, 45±6 mm) with a history of paroxysmal (40/66, 61%) or persistent atrial fibrillation and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences despite previous successful second generation 28-mm cryoballoon-based PVI were included in this analysis. During the index PVI, the standard freeze cycle duration was 240 s. After successful PVI, a bonus freeze cycle of 240 s was applied in the first 15 of 66 (23%) patients, whereas no bonus freeze cycle was applied in the remaining patients. Repeat procedures were performed after a median of 205 (131–357) days following the index ablation. Electric reconduction was assessed for all PVs, and reablation was performed using radiofrequency energy. Persistent electric isolation was noted in 178 of 258 (69%) PVs. In 17 of 66 (26%) patients, all previously targeted PVs remained isolated. A significant difference toward highest reconduction rate for the posteroinferior segment of the right inferior PV was found (P=0.0002). Conclusions—The second-generation cryoballoon ablation is associated with a high rate of persistent PVI. The posteroinferior segment of the right inferior PV showed the highest reconduction rate and seems to be a predilection site for PV reconduction.
- Journal Articles
Related Resources
European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/ Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is an important treatment option for maintaining a normal heart rhythm and reducing arrhythmia-related symptoms. This consensus statement provides healthcare providers with clinical practice standards and advice on which patients should receive ablation, how to perform the procedure, and how to manage patients before, during, and afterwards.
2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards Update: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force
Journal Articles: The last expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards was published in 2001 (1). Since then, many changes have occurred as the setting has evolved from being primarily diagnostic based into a therapeutic environment. Technology has changed both the imaging and reporting systems. The lower risk of invasive procedures has seen the expansion of cardiac catheterization laboratories to sites without onsite cardiovascular surgery backup and even to community hospitals where primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is now being performed. This has increased the importance of quality assurance (QA) and quality improvement (QI) initiatives. At the same time, the laboratory has become a multipurpose suite with both diagnostic procedures to investigate pulmonary hypertension and coronary flow and with therapeutic procedures that now include intervention into the cerebral and peripheral vascular systems as well as in structural heart disease. These new procedures have impacted both the adult and pediatric catheterization laboratories. The approaches now available allow for the treatment of even very complex heart disease and have led to the development of hybrid cardiac catheterization laboratories where a team of physicians (including invasive cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, noninvasive cardiologists, and anesthesiologists) is required.