Left Atrial Appendage Isolation in Patients Not Responding to Pulmonary Vein Isolation – Benefit and Risks

Journal Articles: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective strategy for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).1 However, in patients with persistent AF and long-standing persistent AF, PVI is associated with limited success, with patients not responding to PVI.2 Recently, the BELIEF trial (Effect of Empirical Left Atrial Appendage Isolation on Long-term Procedure Outcome in Patients With Persistent or Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation) showed that an electric isolation of the left atrial (LA) appendage (LAA) in addition to PVI could increase clinical success.3 Although potentially effective, this strategy causes electromechanical dissociation of the LAA and was assumed to be associated with increased risk for LAA thrombus and thromboembolism.4 We sought to investigate the incidence of LAA thrombus and thromboembolism and the impact of LAA closure on the prevention of thromboembolic events, in addition to the clinical benefit after left atrial appendage isolation (LAAI).