Procedure / Surgery

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Patient Education

This short video provides patients with information about the ablation procedure and important discharge education in the immediate post procedure period.

Read More

Management of Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Devices in a Procedural Setting

Care Pathways/CDS: The purpose of this guideline document is to establish a process for the safe management of patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED) around the time of surgeries or procedures.

Read More

AF Agile Pathway – Ambulatory

AF Agile Pathway – Ambulatory

Read More

EP Preprocedure Site Prep One-Pager

Checklists: UW Health Nursing One Pager – Electrophysiology Procedure Site Preparation

Read More

EPS/Ablation Coordination Checklist

Checklists: Checklist for care coordination for EPS/Ablation.

Read More

AF Same Day Discharge Checklist

Checklists: Checklist to use when discharging and AFib patient same day.

Read More

A worldwide survey on incidence, management, and prognosis of oesophageal fistula formation following atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the POTTER-AF study

Data/Registries: Aims: Oesophageal fistula represents a rare but dreadful complication of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Data on its incidence, management, and outcome are sparse. Methods and results: This international multicentre registry investigates the characteristics of oesophageal fistulae after treatment of atrial fibrillation by catheter ablation. A total of 553 729 catheter ablation procedures (radiofrequency: 62.9%, cryoballoon: 36.2%, other modalities: 0.9%) were performed, at 214 centres in 35 countries. In 78 centres 138 patients [0.025%, radiofrequency: 0.038%, cryoballoon: 0.0015% (P < 0.0001)] were diagnosed with an oesophageal fistula. Peri-procedural data were available for 118 patients (85.5%). Following catheter ablation, the median time to symptoms and the median time to diagnosis were 18 (7.75, 25; range: 0–60) days and 21 (15, 29.5; range: 2–63) days, respectively. The median time from symptom onset to oesophageal fistula diagnosis was 3 (1, 9; range: 0–42) days. The most common initial symptom was fever (59.3%). The diagnosis was established by chest computed tomography in 80.2% of patients. Oesophageal surgery was performed in 47.4% and direct endoscopic treatment in 19.8% and conservative treatment in 32.8% of patients. The overall mortality was 65.8%. Mortality following surgical (51.9%) or endoscopic treatment (56.5%) was significantly lower as compared to conservative management (89.5%) [odds ratio 7.463 (2.414, 23.072) P < 0.001]. Conclusion: Oesophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is rare and occurs mostly with the use of radiofrequency energyrather than cryoenergy. Mortality without surgical or endoscopic intervention is exceedingly high.

Read More

AFib Toolkit: Catheter-based Ablation Procedures: Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Education – Patient/Caregiver: One-page patient education resource explaining Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Includes procedure, post-procedure, procedural risk, and office follow up.

Read More

Once Isolated, Always Isolated? Incidence and Characteristics of Pulmonary Vein Reconduction After Second-Generation Cryoballoon-Based Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Journal Articles: Background—The second-generation cryoballoon delivers effective pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) associated with superior 1-year clinical outcome. However, data on reconduction of previously isolated PV are sparse. Methods and Results—A total of 421 patients underwent second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon-based PVI in 2 centers (St. George’s hospital and Harburg hospital, Hamburg, Germany) between June 2012 and May 2015. Sixty-six of 421 (16%) patients (39/66, 59% women; mean age, 63±10 years, mean left atrium diameter, 45±6 mm) with a history of paroxysmal (40/66, 61%) or persistent atrial fibrillation and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences despite previous successful second generation 28-mm cryoballoon-based PVI were included in this analysis. During the index PVI, the standard freeze cycle duration was 240 s. After successful PVI, a bonus freeze cycle of 240 s was applied in the first 15 of 66 (23%) patients, whereas no bonus freeze cycle was applied in the remaining patients. Repeat procedures were performed after a median of 205 (131–357) days following the index ablation. Electric reconduction was assessed for all PVs, and reablation was performed using radiofrequency energy. Persistent electric isolation was noted in 178 of 258 (69%) PVs. In 17 of 66 (26%) patients, all previously targeted PVs remained isolated. A significant difference toward highest reconduction rate for the posteroinferior segment of the right inferior PV was found (P=0.0002). Conclusions—The second-generation cryoballoon ablation is associated with a high rate of persistent PVI. The posteroinferior segment of the right inferior PV showed the highest reconduction rate and seems to be a predilection site for PV reconduction.

Read More

Reconduction After Second-Generation Cryoballoon-Based Pulmonary Vein Isolation ― Impact of Different Ablation Strategies

Journal Articles: Background: The second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) has demonstrated high procedural efficacy and convincing clinical success rates for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Nevertheless, data on the impact of different ablations protocols on durability are limited. The aim was to comparing the durability of PVI following 3 different ablation strategies in patients with recurrence of atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia undergoing repeat procedures. Methods and Results: In 192 patients, a total of 751 PVs were identified. All PVs were successfully isolated during index PVI. Thirty-one out of 192 (16%) patients were treated with a bonus-freeze protocol (group 1), 67/192 (35%) patients with a no bonus freeze protocol (group 2), and 94/192 (49%) patients with a time-to-effect-guided protocol (group 3). Persistent PVI was documented in 419/751 (55.8%) PVs, and in 41/192 (21%) patients, all PVs were persistently isolated. The total rate of PV reconnection was not significantly different between the groups (P=0.134) and the comparison of individual PVs revealed no differences (P-values for RSPV: 0.424, RIPV: 0.541, LSPV: 0.788, LIPV: 0.346, LCPV: 0.865). The procedure times were significantly reduced by omitting the bonus-freeze and applying individualized application times

Read More